(Msg. 81) Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: New PC, ME with old BIOS [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: microsoft>public>windowsme>setup (more info?)
Test for Mart
--
Mike
Mike M <No_Spam.TakeThisOut@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote:
> What problems do you have when running the package in Win98/Me
> compatibility mode on XP?
(Msg. 82) Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:11 pm
Post subject: Re: New PC, ME with old BIOS [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Mike M <No_Spam RemoveThis @Corned_Beef.Only> wrote:
> Test for Mart
And another. In this case with a severely pruned References header which
should allow it to be posted whilst still being correctly threaded.
--
Mike
(Msg. 83) Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:32 pm
Post subject: Re: New PC, ME with old BIOS [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Thanks Mike,
<snip>
Sorry guys - looks like the sub-thread is too long, it won't let me add a
further reply to
your message Mike.
FWIW - I've started new sub thread which was only to say :-
> example you are suddenly unable to access Help without encountering an
> error post back and either Mart or myself will try and help you out.
Only as far as I am able Mike, don't forget I don't have VPC <g>
</snip>
OK, we can kill that 'new sub thread' and continue here - and BTW I do have
WinMe running on another machine and will continue to help Bill as far as I
am able.
Mart
"Mike M" <No_Spam.DeleteThis@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message
news:uEorJ4nmIHA.1368@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Mike M <No_Spam.DeleteThis@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote:
>
>> Test for Mart
>
> And another. In this case with a severely pruned References header which
> should allow it to be posted whilst still being correctly threaded.
> --
> Mike
>
>
>
(Msg. 84) Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 12:59 am
Post subject: Re: New PC, ME with old BIOS [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Bill asked :-
> Mike, I don't understand your terminology. The term
> 'compatibility mode' is (surprisingly, I guess) new to me.
"William B. Lurie" <billurie.TakeThisOut@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:O95AfZomIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Mike M wrote:
>> William B. Lurie <billurie.TakeThisOut@nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Okay, then I'll use the basic system until some time
>>> when I might go online with it. The intended use which
>>> triggered this exercise is in a self-contained application
>>> package.
>>
>> What problems do you have when running the package in Win98/Me
>> compatibility mode on XP?
> Mike, I don't understand your terminology. The term
> 'compatibility mode' is (surprisingly, I guess) new to me.
>
> Up to 18 months ago I had a 2.1GHz PC in which I formatted
> an HDD and installed Win98 and upgraded to Win ME. I believe
> that it had 768MB Ram. PC died 18 months ago but I kept the
> HDD which, as you know I can pull all the files off but cannot
> make its OS operate. That's where I started bugging you most
> valuable people.
>
> My old Dos programs ran fine from command prompt on that Win ME.
> I made graphs on screen, and captured them to IrfanView and file.
> If I try to run the same programs by copying them over to
> XP and running them from either Windows Explorer or CMD,
> the programs run, but I have not found a way to get the graphs that
> they produce onscreen, to print, or to a file, I can't Screen Capture
> by 'normal' methods, or by any of half a dozen 'third party' capture
> programs that I've tried.
>
> This has been a long story, and maybe most of what I'm telling
> you is extraneous.....but I'm trying to be complete.
All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change) Goto page Previous1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11
Page 11 of 11
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum