HELP

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:26:56 -0500, "Unknown" <unknown.DeleteThis@unknown.kom>
wrote:

> She said she has 256meg.


So? The recommendation to which I responded was to upgrade to 1GB. My
message was to agree with Shenan that that's probably overkill.

Whether she should upgrade her RAM at all I don't know, because I
don't know what apps she runs. However, noting that she has 54.77 MB
unused, my guess is probably not.


> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake.DeleteThis@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> news:8po184te5d48r3g73digs0lf690er66luo@4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:51:54 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
> > <newshelper.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> > It shows your CUP and RAM. Go to crucial dot com and increase your
> >> > RAM memory to 1024 or your pc will never run fast.
> >>
> >> I disagree. Roxie now has 56MB of free physical memory - memory might
> >> help
> >> stop some swap file usage, but if nothing changed and Roxie has freed up
> >> space on the hard disk drive - RAM is not the (only) issue.
> >
> >
> > I share your disagreement. In fact it is rare that anyone needs as
> > much as 1GB of RAM with Windows XP. Only if someone runs particularly
> > memory-demanding programs (such as photo- or video-editing) is it
> > likely that more than 512MB is needed (and not always that much
> > either).
> >
> > --
> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Your last sentence.
"Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake DeleteThis @this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
news:8mv184t5rv144163q5lagudsj57is4jo6a@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:26:56 -0500, "Unknown" <unknown DeleteThis @unknown.kom>
> wrote:
>
>> She said she has 256meg.
>
>
> So? The recommendation to which I responded was to upgrade to 1GB. My
> message was to agree with Shenan that that's probably overkill.
>
> Whether she should upgrade her RAM at all I don't know, because I
> don't know what apps she runs. However, noting that she has 54.77 MB
> unused, my guess is probably not.
>
>
>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake DeleteThis @this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>> news:8po184te5d48r3g73digs0lf690er66luo@4ax.com...
>> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:51:54 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
>> > <newshelper DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> > It shows your CUP and RAM. Go to crucial dot com and increase your
>> >> > RAM memory to 1024 or your pc will never run fast.
>> >>
>> >> I disagree. Roxie now has 56MB of free physical memory - memory might
>> >> help
>> >> stop some swap file usage, but if nothing changed and Roxie has freed
>> >> up
>> >> space on the hard disk drive - RAM is not the (only) issue.
>> >
>> >
>> > I share your disagreement. In fact it is rare that anyone needs as
>> > much as 1GB of RAM with Windows XP. Only if someone runs particularly
>> > memory-demanding programs (such as photo- or video-editing) is it
>> > likely that more than 512MB is needed (and not always that much
>> > either).
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>
>
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

"Unknown" <unknown RemoveThis @unknown.kom> wrote in message
news:qn7gk.14697$xZ.8068@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...
> Your last sentence.
> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake RemoveThis @this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> news:8mv184t5rv144163q5lagudsj57is4jo6a@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:26:56 -0500, "Unknown" <unknown RemoveThis @unknown.kom>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> She said she has 256meg.
>>
>>
>> So? The recommendation to which I responded was to upgrade to 1GB. My
>> message was to agree with Shenan that that's probably overkill.
>>
>> Whether she should upgrade her RAM at all I don't know, because I
>> don't know what apps she runs. However, noting that she has 54.77 MB
>> unused, my guess is probably not.
>>
>>
>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake RemoveThis @this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>>> news:8po184te5d48r3g73digs0lf690er66luo@4ax.com...
>>> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:51:54 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
>>> > <newshelper RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> > It shows your CUP and RAM. Go to crucial dot com and increase your
>>> >> > RAM memory to 1024 or your pc will never run fast.
>>> >>
>>> >> I disagree. Roxie now has 56MB of free physical memory - memory
>>> >> might
>>> >> help
>>> >> stop some swap file usage, but if nothing changed and Roxie has freed
>>> >> up
>>> >> space on the hard disk drive - RAM is not the (only) issue.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I share your disagreement. In fact it is rare that anyone needs as
>>> > much as 1GB of RAM with Windows XP. Only if someone runs particularly
>>> > memory-demanding programs (such as photo- or video-editing) is it
>>> > likely that more than 512MB is needed (and not always that much
>>> > either).
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>

What? Is that some sort of threat?

Ken's last sentence was: "However, noting that she has 54.77 MB unused, my
guess is probably not." What about it? Did you miss the word "unused"?

Don't you have any comprehension?
"Olórin" <incanus.TakeThisOut@erkljrjre890aeraekj4na.com> wrote in message
news:eOKEx1w6IHA.3684@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> "Unknown" <unknown.TakeThisOut@unknown.kom> wrote in message
> news:qn7gk.14697$xZ.8068@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...
>> Your last sentence.
>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake.TakeThisOut@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>> news:8mv184t5rv144163q5lagudsj57is4jo6a@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:26:56 -0500, "Unknown" <unknown.TakeThisOut@unknown.kom>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> She said she has 256meg.
>>>
>>>
>>> So? The recommendation to which I responded was to upgrade to 1GB. My
>>> message was to agree with Shenan that that's probably overkill.
>>>
>>> Whether she should upgrade her RAM at all I don't know, because I
>>> don't know what apps she runs. However, noting that she has 54.77 MB
>>> unused, my guess is probably not.
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake.TakeThisOut@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>>>> news:8po184te5d48r3g73digs0lf690er66luo@4ax.com...
>>>> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:51:54 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
>>>> > <newshelper.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >> > It shows your CUP and RAM. Go to crucial dot com and increase
>>>> >> > your
>>>> >> > RAM memory to 1024 or your pc will never run fast.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I disagree. Roxie now has 56MB of free physical memory - memory
>>>> >> might
>>>> >> help
>>>> >> stop some swap file usage, but if nothing changed and Roxie has
>>>> >> freed up
>>>> >> space on the hard disk drive - RAM is not the (only) issue.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I share your disagreement. In fact it is rare that anyone needs as
>>>> > much as 1GB of RAM with Windows XP. Only if someone runs particularly
>>>> > memory-demanding programs (such as photo- or video-editing) is it
>>>> > likely that more than 512MB is needed (and not always that much
>>>> > either).
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>>> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>
>
> What? Is that some sort of threat?
>
> Ken's last sentence was: "However, noting that she has 54.77 MB unused, my
> guess is probably not." What about it? Did you miss the word "unused"?
>

"Unknown" <unknown.RemoveThis@unknown.kom> wrote in message
news:345hk.2425$zv7.405@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...
> Don't you have any comprehension?
> "Olórin" <incanus.RemoveThis@erkljrjre890aeraekj4na.com> wrote in message
> news:eOKEx1w6IHA.3684@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> "Unknown" <unknown.RemoveThis@unknown.kom> wrote in message
>> news:qn7gk.14697$xZ.8068@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>> Your last sentence.
>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake.RemoveThis@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>>> news:8mv184t5rv144163q5lagudsj57is4jo6a@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:26:56 -0500, "Unknown" <unknown.RemoveThis@unknown.kom>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> She said she has 256meg.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So? The recommendation to which I responded was to upgrade to 1GB. My
>>>> message was to agree with Shenan that that's probably overkill.
>>>>
>>>> Whether she should upgrade her RAM at all I don't know, because I
>>>> don't know what apps she runs. However, noting that she has 54.77 MB
>>>> unused, my guess is probably not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake.RemoveThis@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>>>>> news:8po184te5d48r3g73digs0lf690er66luo@4ax.com...
>>>>> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:51:54 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
>>>>> > <newshelper.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> > It shows your CUP and RAM. Go to crucial dot com and increase
>>>>> >> > your
>>>>> >> > RAM memory to 1024 or your pc will never run fast.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I disagree. Roxie now has 56MB of free physical memory - memory
>>>>> >> might
>>>>> >> help
>>>>> >> stop some swap file usage, but if nothing changed and Roxie has
>>>>> >> freed up
>>>>> >> space on the hard disk drive - RAM is not the (only) issue.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I share your disagreement. In fact it is rare that anyone needs as
>>>>> > much as 1GB of RAM with Windows XP. Only if someone runs
>>>>> > particularly
>>>>> > memory-demanding programs (such as photo- or video-editing) is it
>>>>> > likely that more than 512MB is needed (and not always that much
>>>>> > either).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>>>> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>>> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>>
>>
>> What? Is that some sort of threat?
>>
>> Ken's last sentence was: "However, noting that she has 54.77 MB unused,
>> my guess is probably not." What about it? Did you miss the word "unused"?
>>
>
>

No, not of what you're trying to contribute to this thread, if anything.

I should have learned from previous sword-crossings with you; trying to coax
rationality and coherence out of you isn't worth the effort.

Not if you don't have any comprehension.
"Olórin" <incanus.RemoveThis@erkljrjre890aeraekj4na.com> wrote in message
news:OFXWIN96IHA.392@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> "Unknown" <unknown.RemoveThis@unknown.kom> wrote in message
> news:345hk.2425$zv7.405@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...
>> Don't you have any comprehension?
>> "Olórin" <incanus.RemoveThis@erkljrjre890aeraekj4na.com> wrote in message
>> news:eOKEx1w6IHA.3684@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> "Unknown" <unknown.RemoveThis@unknown.kom> wrote in message
>>> news:qn7gk.14697$xZ.8068@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>> Your last sentence.
>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake.RemoveThis@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>>>> news:8mv184t5rv144163q5lagudsj57is4jo6a@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:26:56 -0500, "Unknown" <unknown.RemoveThis@unknown.kom>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> She said she has 256meg.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So? The recommendation to which I responded was to upgrade to 1GB. My
>>>>> message was to agree with Shenan that that's probably overkill.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whether she should upgrade her RAM at all I don't know, because I
>>>>> don't know what apps she runs. However, noting that she has 54.77 MB
>>>>> unused, my guess is probably not.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake.RemoveThis@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:8po184te5d48r3g73digs0lf690er66luo@4ax.com...
>>>>>> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:51:54 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
>>>>>> > <newshelper.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> > It shows your CUP and RAM. Go to crucial dot com and increase
>>>>>> >> > your
>>>>>> >> > RAM memory to 1024 or your pc will never run fast.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I disagree. Roxie now has 56MB of free physical memory - memory
>>>>>> >> might
>>>>>> >> help
>>>>>> >> stop some swap file usage, but if nothing changed and Roxie has
>>>>>> >> freed up
>>>>>> >> space on the hard disk drive - RAM is not the (only) issue.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I share your disagreement. In fact it is rare that anyone needs as
>>>>>> > much as 1GB of RAM with Windows XP. Only if someone runs
>>>>>> > particularly
>>>>>> > memory-demanding programs (such as photo- or video-editing) is it
>>>>>> > likely that more than 512MB is needed (and not always that much
>>>>>> > either).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>>>>> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>>>> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>>>
>>>
>>> What? Is that some sort of threat?
>>>
>>> Ken's last sentence was: "However, noting that she has 54.77 MB unused,
>>> my guess is probably not." What about it? Did you miss the word
>>> "unused"?
>>>
>>
>>
>
> No, not of what you're trying to contribute to this thread, if anything.
>
> I should have learned from previous sword-crossings with you; trying to
> coax rationality and coherence out of you isn't worth the effort.
>