HELP

"Unknown" <unknown DeleteThis @unknown.kom> wrote in message
news:Tunhk.16068$uE5.9334@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com...
> Not if you don't have any comprehension.
> "Olórin" <incanus DeleteThis @erkljrjre890aeraekj4na.com> wrote in message
> news:OFXWIN96IHA.392@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> "Unknown" <unknown DeleteThis @unknown.kom> wrote in message
>> news:345hk.2425$zv7.405@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...
>>> Don't you have any comprehension?
>>> "Olórin" <incanus DeleteThis @erkljrjre890aeraekj4na.com> wrote in message
>>> news:eOKEx1w6IHA.3684@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>> "Unknown" <unknown DeleteThis @unknown.kom> wrote in message
>>>> news:qn7gk.14697$xZ.8068@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>> Your last sentence.
>>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake DeleteThis @this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>>>>> news:8mv184t5rv144163q5lagudsj57is4jo6a@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:26:56 -0500, "Unknown" <unknown DeleteThis @unknown.kom>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She said she has 256meg.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So? The recommendation to which I responded was to upgrade to 1GB. My
>>>>>> message was to agree with Shenan that that's probably overkill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whether she should upgrade her RAM at all I don't know, because I
>>>>>> don't know what apps she runs. However, noting that she has 54.77 MB
>>>>>> unused, my guess is probably not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake DeleteThis @this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:8po184te5d48r3g73digs0lf690er66luo@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:51:54 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
>>>>>>> > <newshelper DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> > It shows your CUP and RAM. Go to crucial dot com and increase
>>>>>>> >> > your
>>>>>>> >> > RAM memory to 1024 or your pc will never run fast.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> I disagree. Roxie now has 56MB of free physical memory - memory
>>>>>>> >> might
>>>>>>> >> help
>>>>>>> >> stop some swap file usage, but if nothing changed and Roxie has
>>>>>>> >> freed up
>>>>>>> >> space on the hard disk drive - RAM is not the (only) issue.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I share your disagreement. In fact it is rare that anyone needs as
>>>>>>> > much as 1GB of RAM with Windows XP. Only if someone runs
>>>>>>> > particularly
>>>>>>> > memory-demanding programs (such as photo- or video-editing) is it
>>>>>>> > likely that more than 512MB is needed (and not always that much
>>>>>>> > either).
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>>>>>> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>>>>> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What? Is that some sort of threat?
>>>>
>>>> Ken's last sentence was: "However, noting that she has 54.77 MB unused,
>>>> my guess is probably not." What about it? Did you miss the word
>>>> "unused"?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No, not of what you're trying to contribute to this thread, if anything.
>>
>> I should have learned from previous sword-crossings with you; trying to
>> coax rationality and coherence out of you isn't worth the effort.
>>
>
>

See, like I just said, it's not worth the effort. You know, sometimes you
contribute intelligently here, yet other times you really just come across
as a complete... well, it sounds like you're undergoing Disjointed Speaking
Training with a Zen Master or something.

I've tried to clarify, for myself as well as the OP, what your objection to
Ken's advice was, but you can't be bothered. If you think Roxie should
increase RAM to 512MB, then just say so.

I'll leave the last word in this sub-thread to you, as I'm sure you'll have
something sparkling to say now...

Ok! I see you still have no comprehension, just a big mouth.
"Olórin" <incanus.TakeThisOut@erkljrjre890aeraekj4na.com> wrote in message
news:eZAunuK7IHA.3652@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> "Unknown" <unknown.TakeThisOut@unknown.kom> wrote in message
> news:Tunhk.16068$uE5.9334@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com...
>> Not if you don't have any comprehension.
>> "Olórin" <incanus.TakeThisOut@erkljrjre890aeraekj4na.com> wrote in message
>> news:OFXWIN96IHA.392@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>> "Unknown" <unknown.TakeThisOut@unknown.kom> wrote in message
>>> news:345hk.2425$zv7.405@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...
>>>> Don't you have any comprehension?
>>>> "Olórin" <incanus.TakeThisOut@erkljrjre890aeraekj4na.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:eOKEx1w6IHA.3684@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> "Unknown" <unknown.TakeThisOut@unknown.kom> wrote in message
>>>>> news:qn7gk.14697$xZ.8068@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>>> Your last sentence.
>>>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake.TakeThisOut@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:8mv184t5rv144163q5lagudsj57is4jo6a@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:26:56 -0500, "Unknown" <unknown.TakeThisOut@unknown.kom>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She said she has 256meg.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So? The recommendation to which I responded was to upgrade to 1GB.
>>>>>>> My
>>>>>>> message was to agree with Shenan that that's probably overkill.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whether she should upgrade her RAM at all I don't know, because I
>>>>>>> don't know what apps she runs. However, noting that she has 54.77 MB
>>>>>>> unused, my guess is probably not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake.TakeThisOut@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in
>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>> news:8po184te5d48r3g73digs0lf690er66luo@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:51:54 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
>>>>>>>> > <newshelper.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >> > It shows your CUP and RAM. Go to crucial dot com and increase
>>>>>>>> >> > your
>>>>>>>> >> > RAM memory to 1024 or your pc will never run fast.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> I disagree. Roxie now has 56MB of free physical memory - memory
>>>>>>>> >> might
>>>>>>>> >> help
>>>>>>>> >> stop some swap file usage, but if nothing changed and Roxie has
>>>>>>>> >> freed up
>>>>>>>> >> space on the hard disk drive - RAM is not the (only) issue.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I share your disagreement. In fact it is rare that anyone needs
>>>>>>>> > as
>>>>>>>> > much as 1GB of RAM with Windows XP. Only if someone runs
>>>>>>>> > particularly
>>>>>>>> > memory-demanding programs (such as photo- or video-editing) is it
>>>>>>>> > likely that more than 512MB is needed (and not always that much
>>>>>>>> > either).
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>>>>>>> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
>>>>>>> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What? Is that some sort of threat?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ken's last sentence was: "However, noting that she has 54.77 MB
>>>>> unused, my guess is probably not." What about it? Did you miss the
>>>>> word "unused"?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, not of what you're trying to contribute to this thread, if anything.
>>>
>>> I should have learned from previous sword-crossings with you; trying to
>>> coax rationality and coherence out of you isn't worth the effort.
>>>
>>
>>
>
> See, like I just said, it's not worth the effort. You know, sometimes you
> contribute intelligently here, yet other times you really just come across
> as a complete... well, it sounds like you're undergoing Disjointed
> Speaking Training with a Zen Master or something.
>
> I've tried to clarify, for myself as well as the OP, what your objection
> to Ken's advice was, but you can't be bothered. If you think Roxie should
> increase RAM to 512MB, then just say so.
>
> I'll leave the last word in this sub-thread to you, as I'm sure you'll
> have something sparkling to say now...
>