WUGNET, the Windows User Group Network
Your Complete Resource Center for "The Best" in Shareware, Computing Tips and Support, Windows Industry News... and much more!
Home Forums Shareware Windows Tips Hot Offers FREE Newsletters Arcade Contact Us About Partners
Search WUGNET: RSS Feeds RSS Feeds Advertise with WUGNET    |    Shareware eBooks
HomeHome FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Triple-booting - which first?

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2
   Home -> Vista -> General Discussions RSS
Next:  BUG: Windows Explorer ALT+D shortcut doesn't work..  
Author Message
dennis

External


Since: Aug 22, 2007
Posts: 1005



(Msg. 9) Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:28 am
Post subject: Re: Triple-booting - which first? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>os>linux>ubuntu, others (more info?)

"Canuck57" <dave-no_spam DeleteThis @unixhome.net> wrote in message
news:_M5Wj.134364$rd2.105038@pd7urf3no...


> Only one issue with wubi... but I admit I have never run Ubuntu that way.
>
> Do you get the FULL performance benefit of disk and network read/writes or
> does the Vista drivers still cripple you?

It doesn't use windows to run linux at all, wubi just sets up the machine
for dual boot.

>
> For example, I can copy in files to vista at about 5mbs. In linux in a
> real partition I get 100mbs. That is 20 times faster!

So put the fixes on vista and get the full speed, its just as well I didn't
talk about old unfixed versions of linux or you would be up in arms. Do you
think you need to lie here like you do in the vista groups? Nobody here
really cares about vista.

>
> Question, is this hit not as bad in wubi? Is it worth the hit?

You don't know what wubi is, I suggest you read up on it as its a useful
program even if some people say there are no useful windows programs.

>
>
Back to top
Login to vote
Timothy Daniels

External


Since: Aug 20, 2007
Posts: 163



(Msg. 10) Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Triple-booting - which first? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: microsoft>public>windows>vista>general, others (more info?)

"Rick Rogers" wrote:
> XP/Vista/Linux
>
> Only the Linux bootloader is capable of loading the other two.
> Window's version cannot load Linux. Alternatively you can use
> a third party bootloader that can handle any of them, then it
> won't matter which order you install them in.

You're confusing boot manager and loader. Loaders are
OS-specific. Boot managers needn't be OS-specific. The
Windows boot managers have been able to direct Linux booting
for years, and the Linux boot manager has long been able to
direct Windows loading. All they have to do is to invoke the
appropriate loader. For instance, to let Vista direct the loading
of Linux, read this:
http://apcmag.com/how_to_dualboot_vista_with_linux_vista_installed_first.htm

And then read the last sentence of the tutorial:

"If instead of GRUB you want Vista's bootloader to be in charge,
load up the Vista installation and install EasyBCD. Go to
"Manage Bootloader", then "Reinstall the Vista Bootloader",
an[d] GRUB is overwritten. You can then configure the Vista
bootloader to add Linux to the boot menu."

In essence, GRUB should be installed in the Linux root partition
instead of in the MBR, and the Vista boot manager invokes GRUB
there.

*TimDaniels*
Back to top
Login to vote
Canuck57

External


Since: Mar 11, 2008
Posts: 328



(Msg. 11) Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Triple-booting - which first? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>os>linux>ubuntu, others (more info?)

"dennis@home" <dennis RemoveThis @killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote in message
news:g0bjek$b2n$1@news.datemas.de...
>
>
> "Canuck57" <dave-no_spam RemoveThis @unixhome.net> wrote in message
> news:_M5Wj.134364$rd2.105038@pd7urf3no...
>
>
>> Only one issue with wubi... but I admit I have never run Ubuntu that way.
>>
>> Do you get the FULL performance benefit of disk and network read/writes
>> or does the Vista drivers still cripple you?
>
> It doesn't use windows to run linux at all, wubi just sets up the machine
> for dual boot.
>
>>
>> For example, I can copy in files to vista at about 5mbs. In linux in a
>> real partition I get 100mbs. That is 20 times faster!
>
> So put the fixes on vista and get the full speed, its just as well I
> didn't talk about old unfixed versions of linux or you would be up in
> arms. Do you think you need to lie here like you do in the vista groups?
> Nobody here really cares about vista.

I have put fixes on it. I did get some performance improvements with one
applied just before SP1. But it was that much. SP1, didn't make much
difference. It is up to date including drivers. Still it sucks performance
wise to XP or Linux. I haven't had crashes people talk about, just
performance issues.
Back to top
Login to vote
Whoknew

External


Since: May 13, 2008
Posts: 1



(Msg. 12) Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 6:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Triple-booting - which first? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Canuck57" <dave-no_spam DeleteThis @unixhome.net> wrote in message
news:_M5Wj.134364$rd2.105038@pd7urf3no...
>
> does the Vista drivers still cripple you?
>
> For example, I can copy in files to vista at about 5mbs.

That just proves what an idiot you are
Back to top
Login to vote
ray

External


Since: Feb 14, 2007
Posts: 1040



(Msg. 13) Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 8:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Triple-booting - which first? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Mon, 12 May 2008 19:11:33 -0700, Frank wrote:

> Canuck57 wrote:
>
>> "Trevor Best" <newsreply.DeleteThis@besty.org.uk> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2008.05.12.22.22.48.24484@besty.org.uk...
>>
>>>On Mon, 12 May 2008 20:31:11 +0100, dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Rick Rogers" <rick.DeleteThis@mvps.org> wrote in message
>>>>news:#3#t#sBtIHA.5268@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>
>>>>>Hi John,
>>>>>
>>>>>XP/Vista/Linux
>>>>>
>>>>>Only the Linux bootloader is capable of loading the other two.
>>>>>Window's version cannot load Linux.
>>>>
>>>>Wubi sets up windows loader to load linux or windows so it can boot
>>>>linux and it has been able to do so for years.
>>>
>>>Boots Linux from an ext3 partition or only a copy installed in wubi?
>>>
>>>--
>>>A lot of money is tainted: 'Taint yours, and 'taint mine.
>>
>>
>> Only one issue with wubi... but I admit I have never run Ubuntu that
>> way.
>>
>> Do you get the FULL performance benefit of disk and network read/writes
>> or does the Vista drivers still cripple you?
>>
>> For example, I can copy in files to vista at about 5mbs. In linux in a
>> real partition I get 100mbs. That is 20 times faster!
>>
>> Question, is this hit not as bad in wubi? Is it worth the hit?
>>
>>
> Bullshit! Something you're famous for. Frank

Takes one to spot one - you should know.
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
       Home -> Vista -> General Discussions All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Categories:
 Windows XP
  Windows Vista
 Windows Other
 Office
 Office Other
 Security
 WinRAR
  • Home |
  • Shareware |
  • Windows Tips |
  • Hot Offers |
  • FREE Newsletters |
  • Arcade |
  • Forums |
  • eBooks |
  • About WUGNET |
  • Partners |
  • Contact

  • WUGNET Privacy Policy |
  • Link to WUGNET