Roxio

"Dick D." <dick DeleteThis @dastardly.net> wrote in message
news:ju1mj49rsii0jopggb1p9ac60setu1f3fd@4ax.com...
> "Daniel" <noone DeleteThis @nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Dick D." <dick DeleteThis @dastardly.net> wrote in message
>>news:iaikj49uaclgmb2dvkvg3khjet9i7f21sj@4ax.com...
>>> "Daniel" <noone DeleteThis @nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Dick D." <dick DeleteThis @dastardly.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:g5tjj4dqj6nqtkop1gakrfrrr9gm6lkc3v@4ax.com...
>>>>> hyrpwr DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Receiving error message regarding Roxio ADA, tells me that if I
>>>>>>install this softeware it may in the future slow down PC, presently
>>>>>>using VISTA, anyone have experience with ROXIO on VISTA and will it
>>>>>>fact slow down PC?
>>>>>
>>>>> Knowing the version might help.
>>>>
>>>>Why, do you have information on some versions doing what the OP
>>>>describes,
>>>>if so be helpful and let them know what you know.
>>>>
>>>>Or are you just browsing the groups to see what you can pick on??
>>>
>>> If the OP is trying to install an older version, it's probably
>>> incompatible. Rather than post a full list of Vista-compatible
>>> versions, I thought it simpler to ask the OP what version was being
>>> installed.
>>>
>>> That simple enough for your simple mind?
>>
>>So post that information, why go through another potentially
>>unnecessary post.
>>
>>I'm happy to admit to simple if it keeps me apart from your type.
>
> You Aussies surely are a cantankerous bunch.

No, not cantankerous, just simple and logical, to spell it out for you:

A helpful reply from you would have included a statement that the version
being used may not be compatible, you could still have asked the version if
you intended to check it out but the OP may also have checked it out if
they knew why you were asking.

If that is not clear, I give up, even Aussies have their limits.

cheers

Daniel

"+Bob+" <nomailplease.TakeThisOut@example.com> wrote in message
news:p8kmj4dsg5d74tjg1sdhb0c3r259qcacei@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 09:21:41 +1100, "Daniel" <noone.TakeThisOut@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>So post that information, why go through another potentially
>>unnecessary post.
>>
>>I'm happy to admit to simple if it keeps me apart from your type.
>
> His current moniker is "dick" for a reason.

I see, he is known to the NG huh!

cheers

Daniel