(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Simple Question Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
David,
Thanks, Just the answer I needed. You confirmed my suspicions. Sorry
about the second email "Take 2". Wasn't sure I would be understood.
Robert
"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:l7OdnW3IP_PBCevVnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@giganews.com...
> From: "Robert Malkin" <rmalkin_midsouth1 RemoveThis @comcast.com>
>
> | Is previewing an emails body (message) dangerous to malware?
>
>
> It may if the message is in HTML and has and uses exploit code.
>
> --
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html > Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp >
>
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Simple Question Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Robert Malkin wrote:
> Is previewing an emails body (message) dangerous to malware?
If you mean viewing an infected e-mail in Outlook Express's preview
pane, then yes it is dangerous to you, especially if your system is not
fully patched. Perhaps you should consider using a more secure email client.
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Simple Question Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
What's in a Name? wrote:
> Robert Malkin wrote:
>> Is previewing an emails body (message) dangerous to malware?
>
> If you mean viewing an infected e-mail in Outlook Express's preview
> pane, then yes it is dangerous to you, especially if your system is not
> fully patched. Perhaps you should consider using a more secure email
> client.
>
> max
Hi Max.
So if I use a different email client such as Thunderbird, and I do not
use HTML for email, would it be safe to view emails is the preview pane?
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Simple Question Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
canadiancowboy wrote:
> What's in a Name? wrote:
>> Robert Malkin wrote:
>>> Is previewing an emails body (message) dangerous to malware?
>>
>> If you mean viewing an infected e-mail in Outlook Express's preview
>> pane, then yes it is dangerous to you, especially if your system is
>> not fully patched. Perhaps you should consider using a more secure
>> email client.
>
> So if I use a different email client such as Thunderbird, and I do
> not use HTML for email, would it be safe to view emails is the
> preview pane?
Yes, but help yourself and select to *view* received email in Plain
Text.
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Simple Question Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
canadiancowboy wrote:
> What's in a Name? wrote:
>> Robert Malkin wrote:
>>> Is previewing an emails body (message) dangerous to malware?
>>
>> If you mean viewing an infected e-mail in Outlook Express's preview
>> pane, then yes it is dangerous to you, especially if your system is
>> not fully patched. Perhaps you should consider using a more secure
>> email client.
>>
>> max
>
> Hi Max.
>
> So if I use a different email client such as Thunderbird, and I do not
> use HTML for email, would it be safe to view emails is the preview pane?
The pre-view pane has exactly the same security risks as the view
window. Calling it the "preview" pane is a misnomer, as the mail/news
client in fact opens the message to display it in the preview pane. The
pane is is just another window.
Keep in mind that the default is (or should be set to) "nothing opened
until the header is clicked". Mail clients usually download everything,
so if you delete the message from the header pane, it will not be
opened. News clients generally default to no downloads until the header
is clicked, but some people like to download everything and then choose
which posts to open. I think this is bad practice.
Blocking HTML will add a smidgen of security, yes, but not enough IMO to
make a difference. As for plain text: problem is that plain text
messages can have attachments, and these may be infected.
My advice: Use an incoming mail/message scanner that quarantines suspect
stuff. That's about as secure as you can get (not perfect, but it's not
a perfect world, last I looked.)
And of course don't open anything that looks even remotely like spam.
Even if it comes from a friend or relative. The e-mail address may have
been hi-jacked (My wife's e-mail address was hi-jacked when a cousin's
computer became infected. The only cure was to change the address.)
All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum