(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:41 am
Post subject: Re: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
<spamfilterineffect.see.sig.DeleteThis@nowhere.com> wrote:
(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:41 am
Post subject: Re: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
<spamfilterineffect.see.sig RemoveThis @nowhere.com> wrote:
> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT >
Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in your
recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say 1300
sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct? Downloadpipe likes it a
lot giving it their 5 star rating. Snapfiles never has liked dos based
ware from what I've seen. If it truly does a thorough job handling the
sigs you list, then it surely should get a better rating from them.
Bottoms line is I'm getting it and putting it in my recovery toolbox.
(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:53 am
Post subject: Re: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
"Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1 DeleteThis @gmai.com> wrote in news:op.tugcy8snjo4m88
@c57jw11:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
> <spamfilterineffect.see.sig DeleteThis @nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT >>
> OK, I'm looking at bughunter now!
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:55 am
Post subject: Re: BugHunter Signature Update 06.24.2007 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
"Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1.DeleteThis@gmai.com> wrote in
news:op.tugdgeuqjo4m88@c57jw11:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
> <spamfilterineffect.see.sig.DeleteThis@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT >>
> Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in your
> recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say
> 1300 sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct? Downloadpipe
Some of the reviews are outdated yes. While it's true BugHunter can't
prevent you from getting the annoying stuff it scans for, it does a
reasonably decent job of cleaning it up, if I do say so myself. heh.
> likes it a lot giving it their 5 star rating. Snapfiles never has
> liked dos based ware from what I've seen. If it truly does a thorough
> job handling the sigs you list, then it surely should get a better
> rating from them.
It's GUI isn't what they consider to be user friendly. I've been working
on a new layout, but it's not ready to send to beta testers to see if
they even think it's worth doing or not. BugHunter wasn't designed for
eye candy in mind so much as it was for doing what it does best, hunt
down malware.
All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Home
Forums
Home
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
Security