(Msg. 9) Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:05 am
Post subject: Re: Avast or Norton. Who should I trust? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: alt>comp>anti-virus (more info?)
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Bill <blevins.RemoveThis@inbox.com>
wrote:
>On Oct 28, 8:49 pm, "Little Charlie" <littlechar....RemoveThis@bellsouth.net>
>wrote:
>
>> NAV 2009 is very light on resources and very speedy as well as testing very high in detection and cleaning.
>
>NAV has decent detection, but it's still bloatware. The exception
>being their Corporate version.
>
Reports from other sources also suggest that the 2009 version of
Norton has been improved dramatically regarding resource use and
speed.
(Msg. 10) Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:03 am
Post subject: Re: Avast or Norton. Who should I trust? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
On Oct 29, 6:22 am, Wolf Kirchmeir <wolf....DeleteThis@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> FWIW, I installed NAV some years ago because it came on the mobo disk.
>
> Never again.
There's a lot of people that feel that way, Charles Johnson is not one
of them.
I did use the Corporate version a couple of years back and it was
pretty impressive. It was like Norton for adults. Why they just
couldn't make their commercial version as good I do not know.
(Msg. 11) Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:22 am
Post subject: Re: Avast or Norton. Who should I trust? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Little Charlie wrote:
[...]
>
>The entire NAV d/l is less then 50mb.
I wouldn't call that a "small footprint."
FWIW, I installed NAV some years ago because it came on the mobo disk.
(Msg. 12) Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:01 am
Post subject: Re: Avast or Norton. Who should I trust? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Bill wrote:
> On Oct 29, 6:22 am, Wolf Kirchmeir <wolf....TakeThisOut@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I installed NAV some years ago because it came on the mobo disk.
>>
>> Never again.
>
> There's a lot of people that feel that way, Charles Johnson is not one
> of them.
>
> I did use the Corporate version a couple of years back and it was
> pretty impressive. It was like Norton for adults. Why they just
> couldn't make their commercial version as good I do not know.
>
>
Maybe because then they couldn't justify soaking the corps for all
those extra dollars.
All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change) Goto page Previous1, 2
Page 2 of 2
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Home
Forums
Home
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
Security