(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Panda Anti Virus [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Panda Anti Virus [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Go for it !
--
Dave
"David Ellis" <dellis DeleteThis @iowatelecom.net> wrote in message news:cte5ft$hr9$1@news.netins.net...
| What is the group opinion of Panda products. I can get a 2005 version
| for a small sum and am looking rather seriously at changing from Norton.
|
| TIA
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Panda Anti Virus [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
In message <xexKd.75$zb.68@trnddc07>, David H. Lipman
<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> writes
>Go for it !
>
Same here.
--
gillie
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:42 am
Post subject: Re: Panda Anti Virus [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Melissa - 28.01.2005 21:35 :
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
is there any need PGP-signing all your postings? Which?
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:42 am
Post subject: Re: Panda Anti Virus [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:42 am
Post subject: Re: Panda Anti Virus [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Peter Seiler wrote:
> Melissa - 28.01.2005 21:35 :
>
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
> is there any need PGP-signing all your postings? Which?
>
I can see PGP signatures for authenticating commercial correspondence or
where proprietary information is shared, but in a NG arena, it seems
almost....well, pretentious. That's not meant to be a slag, just an
observation.
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:42 am
Post subject: Re: Panda Anti Virus [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Melissa wrote:
> It's a fair question to ask, and I'm not *entirely* convinced that my
> reasons are unquestionably sound, but I do still feel I have my
> reasons. I could tell you all about them in detail, but that could
> take a while as well, so for the moment I'll just say that it has to
> do with some very malicious identity spoofing I was the victim of
> some time ago.
unfortunately, the signatures do not prove that those messages posted
by someone else were not posted by you, they only prove that the
messages you've signed were posted by you...
further, nothing stops a malicious identity thief from signing the
spoofed messages... the only way to tell that they aren't signed with
your key is to actually fire up pgp and check - and almost nobody ever
bothers to do so... nor should they, since all it would really prove is
that the malicious messages were signed with a different key, not that
they were signed by a different person...
pgp clear-signing doesn't protect your identity the way you think it
does...
--
"we are the revenants
and we will rise up from the dead
we become the living
we've come back to reclaim our stolen breath"
All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change) Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Home
Forums
Home
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
Security