(Msg. 9) Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:40 am
Post subject: Re: AVG false positive reported on user32.dll [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: alt>comp>anti-virus (more info?)
tommy wrote:
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>> tommy wrote:
>>> and stamp email with certification stamps .
>>
>> Please don't do that. It's only advertising. There is no way any
>> a-v product can truthfully state that your mail is virus-free. Think
>> about it.
>> -- [please trim signatures. thanks.]
>
> its reassuring to pc novices, and verifies that I do "have" an
> anti-virus program running on my pc.
It is probably more annoying than reassuring to even novices. I doubt
they care if you have an a-v app running, especially those who don't
know what one is. Further, for those who forward email all over the
place, that 'certification' will be included - meaning nothing to the
next level except to confuse.
And as I said, there isn't a single a-v app that can fully guarantee
that what you sent is virus-free. Remember, zero-day viruses won't be
detected, along with the latest morphs of older viruses. It truly is
only an advertisement.
You may certainly continue to scan your outgoing mail (though that isn't
even necessary as all modern viruses use their own SMTP engines quietly
sending while you aren't looking), but there is no need to bother
everyone else. I have one friend who can't be talked out of removing the
ad, and all he does is embarrass himself by showing that he scanned with
an a-v database that is always three to four weeks or more out of date,
and therefore useless.
(Msg. 10) Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:40 pm
Post subject: Re: AVG false positive reported on user32.dll [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
From: "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous.DeleteThis@example.invalid>
| tommy wrote:
>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>>> tommy wrote:
>>>> and stamp email with certification stamps .
>>> Please don't do that. It's only advertising. There is no way any
>>> a-v product can truthfully state that your mail is virus-free. Think
>>> about it.
>>> -- [please trim signatures. thanks.]
>> its reassuring to pc novices, and verifies that I do "have" an
>> anti-virus program running on my pc.
| It is probably more annoying than reassuring to even novices. I doubt
| they care if you have an a-v app running, especially those who don't
| know what one is. Further, for those who forward email all over the
| place, that 'certification' will be included - meaning nothing to the
| next level except to confuse.
| And as I said, there isn't a single a-v app that can fully guarantee
| that what you sent is virus-free. Remember, zero-day viruses won't be
| detected, along with the latest morphs of older viruses. It truly is
| only an advertisement.
| You may certainly continue to scan your outgoing mail (though that isn't
| even necessary as all modern viruses use their own SMTP engines quietly
| sending while you aren't looking), but there is no need to bother
| everyone else. I have one friend who can't be talked out of removing the
| ad, and all he does is embarrass himself by showing that he scanned with
| an a-v database that is always three to four weeks or more out of date,
| and therefore useless.
| Be kind to your correspondents and turn it off.
| --
| -bts
| -Friends don't let friends drive Windows
(Msg. 11) Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:11 pm
Post subject: Re: AVG false positive reported on user32.dll [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:zp-dnR9ZWPLHgrbUnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@giganews.com...
> From: "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous.TakeThisOut@example.invalid>
>
> | tommy wrote:
>
> >> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
> >>> tommy wrote:
> >>>> and stamp email with certification stamps .
>
> >>> Please don't do that. It's only advertising. There is no way any
> >>> a-v product can truthfully state that your mail is virus-free. Think
> >>> about it.
> >>> -- [please trim signatures. thanks.]
>
> >> its reassuring to pc novices, and verifies that I do "have" an
> >> anti-virus program running on my pc.
>
> | It is probably more annoying than reassuring to even novices. I doubt
> | they care if you have an a-v app running, especially those who don't
> | know what one is. Further, for those who forward email all over the
> | place, that 'certification' will be included - meaning nothing to the
> | next level except to confuse.
>
> | And as I said, there isn't a single a-v app that can fully guarantee
> | that what you sent is virus-free. Remember, zero-day viruses won't be
> | detected, along with the latest morphs of older viruses. It truly is
> | only an advertisement.
>
> | You may certainly continue to scan your outgoing mail (though that isn't
> | even necessary as all modern viruses use their own SMTP engines quietly
> | sending while you aren't looking), but there is no need to bother
> | everyone else. I have one friend who can't be talked out of removing the
> | ad, and all he does is embarrass himself by showing that he scanned with
> | an a-v database that is always three to four weeks or more out of date,
> | and therefore useless.
>
> | Be kind to your correspondents and turn it off.
>
> | --
> | -bts
> | -Friends don't let friends drive Windows
>
> I agree with what BTS posted here.
>
> --
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html > Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp >
>
I don't have it turned on. I don't know if AVAST has that feature even. I
like feedback , at least until I can verify that something new to me is
working.
(Msg. 12) Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:08 am
Post subject: Re: AVG false positive reported on user32.dll [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
On Nov 24, 7:02 am, "tommy" <tommylee9_2... RemoveThis @removeyahoo.dropcom>
wrote:
>
> its reassuring to pc novices, and verifies that I do "have" an anti-virus
> program running on my pc.
> --
> Tommy
==========
That can work 2 ways. I've had malware attachments even though the e-
mails had 'certified virus free by *insert AV name*'. Of course the e-
mail was never scanned by any vendor, the text was added in to give
the impression the attachment was scanned.
(Msg. 13) Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:52 am
Post subject: Re: AVG false positive reported on user32.dll [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
"Duh_OZ" <ozzy.kopec.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fa43dbf2-9c43-4947-a8c8-0700bc30e31e@41g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 24, 7:02 am, "tommy" <tommylee9_2....RemoveThis@removeyahoo.dropcom>
wrote:
>
> its reassuring to pc novices, and verifies that I do "have" an anti-virus
> program running on my pc.
> --
> Tommy
==========
That can work 2 ways. I've had malware attachments even though the e-
mails had 'certified virus free by *insert AV name*'. Of course the e-
mail was never scanned by any vendor, the text was added in to give
the impression the attachment was scanned.
perfection is hard to attain. I settle in such cases for 99% where it's not.
I can't tag messages because gmail uses ssl, but since I use gmail now, the
incoming mail is scanned by them . Moot point
All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change) Goto page Previous1, 2
Page 2 of 2
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum