(Msg. 17) Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 8:12 am
Post subject: RE: Publisher vs. InDesign [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: microsoft>public>publisher>prepress (more info?)
I work for a small commercial real estate company and we do all of our
marketing materials inhouse - preparing, printing, etc. - in Microsoft
Office. Someone has suggested we go to Quark or InLine Design to make them
more professional looking. Both of these packages appeared to be quite
complicated unless you have some sort of graphics design background. After
all of your responses, what did you decide to do about software packages?
"Debra" wrote:
> I'm evaluating software packages. I know Publisher and NOT InDesign but hear
> that InDesign is better for commercial work. It seems much more complex
> though. Any suggestions? Does Publisher work well for you for professional
> brochures, etc.? Also - any suggestions on a photo editing software?
(Msg. 18) Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 11:16 am
Post subject: Re: Publisher vs. InDesign [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Programs do NOT make documentation "professional looking". The skill of the
person doing the layout does. The right person could do the job with Paint.
(ugh!)
"Buffy" <Buffy.RemoveThis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B9D5AF29-6D81-4F98-B058-93AEE18616A9@microsoft.com...
>I work for a small commercial real estate company and we do all of our
> marketing materials inhouse - preparing, printing, etc. - in Microsoft
> Office. Someone has suggested we go to Quark or InLine Design to make them
> more professional looking. Both of these packages appeared to be quite
> complicated unless you have some sort of graphics design background.
> After
> all of your responses, what did you decide to do about software packages?
>
>
>
> "Debra" wrote:
>
>> I'm evaluating software packages. I know Publisher and NOT InDesign but
>> hear
>> that InDesign is better for commercial work. It seems much more complex
>> though. Any suggestions? Does Publisher work well for you for
>> professional
>> brochures, etc.? Also - any suggestions on a photo editing software?
(Msg. 19) Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 3:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Publisher vs. InDesign [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Really depends on what you do with your marketing materials. If it's off to
your usual printer they go then it depends on your printer. If you want a
tool that gives you a lot of latitude (i.e. Working with a lot of commercial
printers) go with InDesign. It is a very flexible tool and has a lot of
prepress capabilities built in. Don't worry about the complexity because
many of the default settings are what your printer wants... And you can
always package the file and send it to them.
The challenge with Publisher is that it is built on a RGB color space and it
can take a lot of work to get it to cough up a file that is "commercial
printer ready." You can use it without too much grief if you don't use spot
colors. Keep in mind that the RGB color space is much broader than the CMYK
color space... Why do you care? Translation results in color shifts more
often than not. In other words, if you're content with printed colors that
are somewhat like what you see on your monitor's screen then you're good to
go with Publisher. If on the other hand, you'd like the printed colors to
look like what you designed... Then avoid Publisher like the plague...
I can't dislike Publisher because it give me a lot of work...
J.P.
On 5/9/07 8:12 AM, in article
B9D5AF29-6D81-4F98-B058-93AEE18616A9.TakeThisOut@microsoft.com, "Buffy"
<Buffy.TakeThisOut@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> I work for a small commercial real estate company and we do all of our
> marketing materials inhouse - preparing, printing, etc. - in Microsoft
> Office. Someone has suggested we go to Quark or InLine Design to make them
> more professional looking. Both of these packages appeared to be quite
> complicated unless you have some sort of graphics design background. After
> all of your responses, what did you decide to do about software packages?
>
>
>
> "Debra" wrote:
>
>> I'm evaluating software packages. I know Publisher and NOT InDesign but hear
>> that InDesign is better for commercial work. It seems much more complex
>> though. Any suggestions? Does Publisher work well for you for professional
>> brochures, etc.? Also - any suggestions on a photo editing software?
(Msg. 20) Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:05 am
Post subject: Re: RE: Publisher vs. InDesign [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Convert Microsoft Publisher to Adobe InDesign
PUB2ID (Microsoft Publisher to Adobe InDesign) is a plug-in for Adobe InDesign. It provides a quick, easy and affordable method for you to migrate all your Microsoft Publisher content into new Adobe InDesign documents. The conversion is enabled with a single click using the InDesign File->Open menu. No more re-creating documents from scratch; PUB2ID gives you a big head-start. Use this link to connect to further product details : http://www.shareware-4-you.com/details.aspx?prodid=3200&catid=3
PUB2ID translates the intricate details of the content within the Microsoft Publisher document and instantly re-creates it within InDesign. Items converted from Publisher include: page size, positioning, colour models, fonts and styles, text attributes and tables, layers, word wrap, linked text boxes as well as automatic extraction of images embedded in the Publisher file.
The PUB2ID (Microsoft Publisher to Adobe InDesign) document conversion technology will save you countless hours of scanning, re-keying and formatting. This product converts and transforms files created with Microsoft Publisher into an Adobe InDesign file on either Macintosh or Windows platforms.
BENEFITS:
• Preserves intellectual property investment
• Enables easy data migration
• Eliminates time re-creating content
• Reduces costs re-creating content
• Freedom to choose your authoring system
FEATURES:
• Supports InDesign CS2 & CS3
• Converts MS Publisher 2002 through 2007
• Available for Macintosh or Windows
• Simple to install
• Quick & easy to use
• Swift return on investment
It doesnt handle tables very well - but you can bring them in as photo files.
"Debra" wrote:
> I'm evaluating software packages. I know Publisher and NOT InDesign but hear
> that InDesign is better for commercial work. It seems much more complex
> though. Any suggestions? Does Publisher work well for you for professional
> brochures, etc.? Also - any suggestions on a photo editing software?
All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change) Goto page Previous1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum