(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:35 am
Post subject: Get Latest vs Non-checked-in Updates Archived from groups: microsoft>public>visual>sourcesafe (more info?)
I'm using VSS 6d. If you're one cup short on coffee and do a Get Latest
with two days worth of updates that have not yet been checked in, why does
VSS not warn you? It just does the Get Latest seemlessly without saying a
word. It seems it should only do the seemless thing if you don't have local
files with newer dates than the server files.
(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Get Latest vs Non-checked-in Updates [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
On Sep 5, 8:35 am, "Phil Galey" <paga... DeleteThis @starcalif.com.nospam> wrote:
> I'm using VSS 6d. If you're one cup short on coffee and do a Get Latest
> with two days worth of updates that have not yet been checked in, why does
> VSS not warn you? It just does the Get Latest seemlessly without saying a
> word. It seems it should only do the seemless thing if you don't have local
> files with newer dates than the server files.
>
> Phil
Hi Phil,
If the local files are read-only, VSS will just replace them with the
database version without saying a word when you do Get. If the local
files are writable, VSS will behave according to the "Replace writable
files" setting at VSS Tools->Options->Local Files tab. By default, VSS
will prompt a dialog box asking you whether to keep your changes or
not.
All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum