Corruption Problem with 2.0

"Louise54" <Louise54.RemoveThis@discussions.microsoft.com> escreveu na notícia da
mensagem:FD9F0FF5-5C0B-44F5-BD47-6F3277E45D7F@microsoft.com...
> Thank you LeeG! This was certainly our problem, and we were at our wits
> end
> trying to figure out what was causing it. Just saw your reply two days
> ago,
> and after immediately installing the hotfix, we have gone two straight
> days
> without an issue - something that hasn't occurred since late May!
> Once again, thank you for taking the time to provide me with this
> information!
> Louise
>
> "LeeG" wrote:
>
>> An issue was introduced with WinXp XP3 as well as a security update
>> Microsoft
>> shipped in late May (MS08-028 / KB950749) that is causing the issue you
>> are
>> experiencing. Call Microsoft Customer Support and request hotfix
>> KB954193.
>>
>> "Louise54" wrote:
>>
>> > I have a multi-user (approx 8 people) on a back-end 2.0 database which
>> > is
>> > currently about 86,000KB in size. They each have a front end on their
>> > local
>> > hard drive, using whatever Access version is on their pc (from 2000 up
>> > to
>> > 2007). The backend has been working just fine for several years until a
>> > few
>> > weeks ago.
>> >
>> > In the last 3 weeks we've been getting "unrecognized database format"
>> > errors
>> > (7 times total). I've been able, thus far, to repair/compact, but it's
>> > taking
>> > longer each time. I'm running through various checks to see if I can
>> > find the
>> > cause.
>> >
>> > At the same time, I think it's probably time to bite the bullet and
>> > convert
>> > the back end to a higher version. I know this has been discussed many
>> > times,
>> > but is there a favorite set of procedures to do this conversion? And a
>> > version more stable than others that I should move to? We don't have
>> > that
>> > many tables, but I think the biggest headache for me will be dealing
>> > with
>> > several auto-number fields. Also, is it ok to have two backend
>> > databases?
>> > Because of size restrictions, I thought it might be better to split the
>> > one
>> > backend into two this time?
>> >
>> > Any and all help, comments, suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>> > Thank
>> > you!
>> > Louise