WUGNET, the Windows User Group Network
Your Complete Resource Center for "The Best" in Shareware, Computing Tips and Support, Windows Industry News... and much more!
Home Forums Shareware Windows Tips Hot Offers FREE Newsletters Arcade Contact Us About Partners
Search WUGNET: RSS Feeds RSS Feeds Advertise with WUGNET    |    Shareware eBooks
HomeHome FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Normalizing/Standardizing Data

 
   Home -> Office -> General Discussions RSS
Next:  Search both mailbox  
Author Message
Stumped

External


Since: Mar 28, 2006
Posts: 11



(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:49 pm
Post subject: Normalizing/Standardizing Data
Archived from groups: microsoft>public>excel>misc (more info?)

Hi,

I am comparing data from 2008 and 2009 but want to ensure I am not comparing
apples & oranges. I am hoping some one can help me.
2009:
10 projects total
8 projects done correctly
1 project done partially correct
1 project done wrong
80% done correctly
10% done partially correct
10% done wrong

2008:
13 projects total
12 projects done correctly
1 project done partially correct
1 project done wrong
92.3% done correctly
7.7% done partially correct
7.7% done wrong

Question: am I comparing apples to apples when I say 7.7% were done
incorrectly in 2008 and 10% were done incorrectly in 2009? I think the total
number of projects is skewing my data and some how I should normalize/equate
the total before doing a percentage check. What do you think?

I am also doing the same review dollar-wise and doing it dollar-wise shows
things were better in 2009 as compared to 2008. Do I need to do something
with the dollars also to make the dollars from one year to the next be equal,
or just the quantity needs to be equal? Or, not at all?

Thanks.
Back to top
Login to vote
Stumped

External


Since: Mar 28, 2006
Posts: 11



(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 4:19 pm
Post subject: RE: Normalizing/Standardizing Data [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Decided to add the dollars for perspective. Also, the question I am trying to
answer is: was there an improvement from 2008 - 2009 in doing projects
correctly?

2009:
$100,000.00 projects total
$94,031.87 projects done correctly
$2,403.40 projects done partially correct
$3,564.73 projects done wrong
94.0% done correctly
2.4% done partially correct
3.6% done wrong

2008:
$227,158.78 projects total
$181,424.88 projects done correctly
$22,533.31 project done partially correct
$23,200.59 project done wrong
79.9% done correctly
9.9% done partially correct
7.7% done wrong



"Stumped" wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am comparing data from 2008 and 2009 but want to ensure I am not comparing
> apples & oranges. I am hoping some one can help me.
> 2009:
> 10 projects total
> 8 projects done correctly
> 1 project done partially correct
> 1 project done wrong
> 80% done correctly
> 10% done partially correct
> 10% done wrong
>
> 2008:
> 13 projects total
> 12 projects done correctly
> 1 project done partially correct
> 1 project done wrong
> 92.3% done correctly
> 7.7% done partially correct
> 7.7% done wrong
>
> Question: am I comparing apples to apples when I say 7.7% were done
> incorrectly in 2008 and 10% were done incorrectly in 2009? I think the total
> number of projects is skewing my data and some how I should normalize/equate
> the total before doing a percentage check. What do you think?
>
> I am also doing the same review dollar-wise and doing it dollar-wise shows
> things were better in 2009 as compared to 2008. Do I need to do something
> with the dollars also to make the dollars from one year to the next be equal,
> or just the quantity needs to be equal? Or, not at all?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
Back to top
Login to vote
Dana DeLouis

External


Since: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: 17



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:12 am
Post subject: Re: Normalizing/Standardizing Data [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> the question I am trying to answer is:
> was there an improvement from 2008 - 2009
> in doing projects correctly?

I'm not a stats guy, so I'm probably wrong here.
To 'Normalize a vector, try this...
In A1:A3, place your data 8,1,1
Place the following in B1, and copy down to B3.

=A1/(SQRT(SUMSQ($A$1:$A$3)))

Do the same with your other data (12,1,1) (Note: Total = 14, not 13)
The two vectors I get are:

{0.984732, 0.123091, 0.123091}


{0.993127, 0.082761, 0.082761}



If we divide the two vectors, we get the following:

{0.991547, 1.48732, 1.48732}

The "success rate" change is very close to one. (meaning not much of a
difference) This is because the 'success rate' is the biggest component
of your 3 items.

The failure rate seems to gotten worse as you said.
It appears worse at 1.48 vs your data of

10/7.7 = 1.2987

Again, I may be wrong here.
= = = = = = = =
HTH
Dana DeLouis


On 10/9/09 7:19 PM, Stumped wrote:
> Decided to add the dollars for perspective. Also, the question I am trying to
> answer is: was there an improvement from 2008 - 2009 in doing projects
> correctly?
>
> 2009:
> $100,000.00 projects total
> $94,031.87 projects done correctly
> $2,403.40 projects done partially correct
> $3,564.73 projects done wrong
> 94.0% done correctly
> 2.4% done partially correct
> 3.6% done wrong
>
> 2008:
> $227,158.78 projects total
> $181,424.88 projects done correctly
> $22,533.31 project done partially correct
> $23,200.59 project done wrong
> 79.9% done correctly
> 9.9% done partially correct
> 7.7% done wrong
>
>
>
> "Stumped" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am comparing data from 2008 and 2009 but want to ensure I am not comparing
>> apples& oranges. I am hoping some one can help me.
>> 2009:
>> 10 projects total
>> 8 projects done correctly
>> 1 project done partially correct
>> 1 project done wrong
>> 80% done correctly
>> 10% done partially correct
>> 10% done wrong
>>
>> 2008:
>> 13 projects total
>> 12 projects done correctly
>> 1 project done partially correct
>> 1 project done wrong
>> 92.3% done correctly
>> 7.7% done partially correct
>> 7.7% done wrong
>>
>> Question: am I comparing apples to apples when I say 7.7% were done
>> incorrectly in 2008 and 10% were done incorrectly in 2009? I think the total
>> number of projects is skewing my data and some how I should normalize/equate
>> the total before doing a percentage check. What do you think?
>>
>> I am also doing the same review dollar-wise and doing it dollar-wise shows
>> things were better in 2009 as compared to 2008. Do I need to do something
>> with the dollars also to make the dollars from one year to the next be equal,
>> or just the quantity needs to be equal? Or, not at all?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
       Home -> Office -> General Discussions All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Categories:
 Windows XP
 Windows Vista
 Windows Other
  Office
 Office Other
 Security
  • Home |
  • Shareware |
  • Windows Tips |
  • Hot Offers |
  • FREE Newsletters |
  • Arcade |
  • Forums |
  • eBooks |
  • About WUGNET |
  • Partners |
  • Contact

  • WUGNET Privacy Policy |
  • Link to WUGNET |
  • IT Support